To start with, one does not go to family law court to have fun as a client.
There is an issue or issues, that need to be fixed or rectified, and in some cases such issues are huge. In other cases the problem may not be a life or death matter, but could involve the ability to maintain a living upon the separation of the parties. Or, it could mean your health isn't that great and you need to maintain health benefits, or it could mean you have been tossed from your residence on some false/fake accusation?
In many cases, to FAIL to win your hearing could be a catastrophic nightmare; or, if you have already LOST your hearing, you may not even have any further chances on that issue unless you can afford a trial?
Very few lost motions have grounds for actual "reconsideration" under the code. It would have to really be something legally addressable to even be reconsidered properly.
Thus, winning can be everything in many cases because Family Law participants are often at the edge of homelessness, or have lost jobs, or their kids have been removed because one party lied, or CPS believed there was danger to the kids when there was no danger, or the kids were actually in harm's way and CPS found it unsubstantiated? In fact Family Law Court is one of the types of situations where a Judge acts as the jury, so not only is everything up to the Judge, you are often only allowed a hearing of 15-20min total for both sides.
If a recommendation from mediation comes out, typically about 75% of such decisions are rubber stamped by Judges. Your remedy is to seek a trial on the issue, and if your trial Judge is the one that rubber stamped the recommendation, you better have your case facts set up if you plan to win.
Attorney's view is that many other attorneys don't necessarily argue the cases persuasively at law and motion hearings, in part because they may have been in Court so many years, they have familiarity with the Court already, whereas an attorney who has not appeared in that court quite as much, has not been tested (as to how the attorney will argue the case...) In litigation, if argued correctly and persuasively, it will increase the client's chances of winning.
In a dog/pony show court (meaning a Court that is somewhat rigged and one can seldom win there) then it's likely best to have an attorney that appears there regularly and for many years. Often very small towns present that problem, but Butte County is not likely like that, as the Court in Family Law is different than it was even 5 years ago. It has gotten better due to the changing of Judges, so that makes for more fairness to parties. So winning can almost mean everything for most clients. They didn't go to court to lose?
Proven Results,20+yr Experience Statewide,High Proven Win Rate
Tuesday, December 6, 2016
Sunday, December 4, 2016
Bankruptcy and Divorce..should You File Now??
Being in Bankruptcy while in a divorce can potentially complicate things. attorney herein doesn't usually recommend it as a general rule. However in some challenging cases, some issues may crop up that can complicate the case:
https://www.thebalance.com/four-reasons-to-delay-filing-your-bankruptcy-case-316336
An Ex-Spouse's Bankruptcy Could Affect You
Your ex-spouse or even current spouse could possibly file BK on debts, but let's say you didn't file. While liability for the joint debt (assuming it was a joint debt) may be discharged as to the ex, the creditors may still pursue YOU if you had not filed. In many cases, creditors don't do this, but if certain debts have already been resold to another collector, that new collector may try to file a lawsuit to collect. The filing fees are not free to file a lawsuit, so creditors usually only file against those they believe may be able to pay down the line.
Failure to answer such lawsuit will result in a default judgment against you, which will continue to rack up interest. This will definitely ruin your credit. If you're not worried about having your credit ruined at the time, possibly filing BK later can still be an option. BK is not near as devastating now since in CA following the 2007 real estate collapse, so many people had ruined credit that a BK filing does some damage all right, but it isn't the same as it used to be. Most clients with jobs upon getting a BK discharge are candidates for a new car loan. Reason for that is because one has no debt, and one has a job, one may be able to then handle the secured debt loan?
Potential issues that could crop up and make your life a living hell:Failure to answer such lawsuit will result in a default judgment against you, which will continue to rack up interest. This will definitely ruin your credit. If you're not worried about having your credit ruined at the time, possibly filing BK later can still be an option. BK is not near as devastating now since in CA following the 2007 real estate collapse, so many people had ruined credit that a BK filing does some damage all right, but it isn't the same as it used to be. Most clients with jobs upon getting a BK discharge are candidates for a new car loan. Reason for that is because one has no debt, and one has a job, one may be able to then handle the secured debt loan?
- Unsettled large tax debts, possibly old enough for discharge, but arguably not because Trustee or creditor has some plausible legal argument for not discharging
- Unknown community debt only taken out by one spouse without other spouse's knowledge but other spouse used both names for credit, and racked up $105,000 in debt
- Unpaid spousal support and the ex is hiding out, hiding assets, and claims he has no assets
- Large inheritance, unknown how long it will pay out, the ex won't disclose it, and may hide it in the bankruptcy
- Ex spouse already filed bankruptcy, failed to disclose certain assets, lied on his paperwork, and
- submitted that data (the false data) into his trial papers
- Recent debts incurred using credit cards for luxury items, vacation or gambling
- Joint debts of both parties are disputed and unpaid, creditors already ruined credit rating, the house was illegally foreclosed, but the eviction was masked so it doesn't show up on credit reports, now some creditors claim that some of the joint debts are not dischargeable for various reasons under the BK code
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
As can be seen, this is just a very small example of problems that can happen in Bankruptcy.
To have a contested hearing in BK, normally you have to set an adversary hearing. The Trustee does not normally take the view of the Debtors since he/she represents creditors.
In real property cases, these issues can become very complicated, and if Receivership is involved, that also makes it subject to the same, if not worse. Litigation on real property tends to get strung out, possibly for years.
Call attorney today if you have problems such as the above. You may want to structure your
dissolution differently before deciding to file the bankruptcy.
Wednesday, November 30, 2016
Domestic Violence Cases Defense
A lot of people don't think anyone should be able to obtain defense counsel for domestic violence allegations.
While we all know that such conduct exists, it would be unfair to say that every case of domestic violence is actually true.
Not every alleged accusation of any crime is necessarily true, and thus the client is presumed innocent UNTIL proven guilty. (In England it's backward, one is PRESUMED guilty, until proven innocent.)
Because of the ramifications in DV cases, ALL accused persons of alleged DV conduct should immediately obtain defense counsel. Assuming you may not want the Public Defender, then it's a given that you should seek help elsewhere. Below are some of the laws involving alleged violence.
If you have been accused of a DV related crime, contact attorney herein for free consultation...(phone number is listed in the TITLE of this site)
While we all know that such conduct exists, it would be unfair to say that every case of domestic violence is actually true.
Not every alleged accusation of any crime is necessarily true, and thus the client is presumed innocent UNTIL proven guilty. (In England it's backward, one is PRESUMED guilty, until proven innocent.)
Because of the ramifications in DV cases, ALL accused persons of alleged DV conduct should immediately obtain defense counsel. Assuming you may not want the Public Defender, then it's a given that you should seek help elsewhere. Below are some of the laws involving alleged violence.
If you have been accused of a DV related crime, contact attorney herein for free consultation...(phone number is listed in the TITLE of this site)
California Domestic Violence Laws
California domestic violence laws make it illegal to use physical force--or to communicate threats of harm--against an intimate partner. These are the most common DV crimes:
Penal Code 273.5 Corporal Injury to a Spouse or Cohabitant -- Penal Code 273.5 makes it illegal to inflict a "corporal injury" resulting in a "traumatic condition." A person commits this crime by striking his/her intimate partner in some violent way and causing a visible injury, even a slight one such as swelling or a bruise. This California domestic violence law can be charged if the alleged victim is a current or former spouse or cohabitant or the parent of your child.
Penal Code 243(e)(1) Domestic Battery -- Penal Code 243(e)(1) makes it a misdemeanor crime to inflict force or violence on an intimate partner...a category that includes your fiancè, cohabitant, the parent of your child, or your current or former spouse or dating partner. Unlike Penal Code 273.5, this California domestic violence law does not require a visible injury.
Penal Code 273d Child Abuse -- Penal Code 273d makes it a crime to inflict "corporal punishment or injury" on a child if it was "cruel or inhuman" and caused an injury (even a slight injury). California child abuse laws allow a parent reasonable latitude to spank a child, but draw the line where the punishment is cruel or injures the child.
Penal Code 273a Child Endangerment -- Penal Code 273a makes it a crime willfully to allow a child (in your care or custody) to suffer harm or to have his/her safety or health endangered. An example would be a mother who permits her boyfriend to beat her 6-year-old; or a parent who operates a dangerous meth lab in the same home where his/her child lives.
Penal Code 270 Child Neglect/Failure to Provide Care -- Penal Code 270 makes it a crime for a parent to fail to provide necessities (like food, shelter, medical care, etc.) to his/her minor child, willfully and without a lawful excuse. For example, a mother might be charged with child neglect/failure to provide care for not providing sufficient food to her children.
Penal Code 368 Elder Abuse - Penal Code 368 makes it a crime to inflict physical abuse, emotional abuse, neglect, endangerment or financial fraud on a victim 65 years of age or older. The crime is usually charged against caregivers, but can also be charged against anyone who commits these sorts of offenses against a senior citizen victim.
Penal Code 422 Criminal Threats -- Penal Code 422 makes it a crime to communicate a threat of serious harm to someone if (1) you intend to put the person in fear, and (2) you actually do put the person in sustained fear. Criminal Threats may be charged as a misdemeanor or a felony. As a felony, it counts as a strike under California Three Strikes Law.
Penal Code 591 Damaging a telephone line -- While not strictly speaking a domestic violence crime, Penal Code 591 damaging a telephone line is often charged along with other domestic violence offenses. This law makes it a crime to cut or otherwise damage a phone line or phone equipment. In domestic incidents, there are frequently allegations that the defendant damaged phone equipment in order to prevent the alleged victim from making a phone call. PC 591 may be charged as a misdemeanor or a felony.
Penal Code 601 Aggravated trespass - Aggravated trespass is a bit like the crime of trespass plus criminal threats. You can be charged with this offense if you make a threat against someone that causes him/her to reasonably fear for his/her physical safety and then, within 30 days, enter his/her home or workplace to carry out the threat. Aggravated trespass is often charged along with other domestic violence offenses. It can be either a misdemeanor or a felony.
Penal Code 647(j)(4) Revenge porn - While not traditionally thought of as domestic violence crimes, certain forms of cyber-harassment are increasingly charged along with domestic violence crimes. As troubled romantic relationships increasingly play themselves out online, this will become only more common. PC 647(j)(4) revenge porn is a good example. You can be accused of this misdemeanor offense if you intentionally distribute sexual photos of another person (such as an ex-girlfriend or ex-wife), with the intent to cause him/her emotional distress.
Penal Code 653.2 Posting harmful information on the internet - This relatively new offense consists of posting harmful information about someone on the internet or sending such information in an email message, with the intent to incite other people to harass him/her. Posting harmful information on the internet (also known as "indirect electronic harassment") is often charged against people who attempt to use the internet to get revenge on the other party in a domestic dispute. PC 653.2 is a misdemeanor.
Sunday, November 27, 2016
PLEASE CLICK LINK BELOW TO VIEW SITE...........THANKS!!
http://buttecountychicofamilylawattorney.blogspot.com/
THANK YOU!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
-------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------
-------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Chico Family Attorney - Can't Afford Huge Legal Fees?
Our Attorneys Only Charge $500-1500+. Get Started With a Family Lawyer Today!
Free Consultation · Connect With a Lawyer Now · Service Available 24/7
Services: Unbundled Legal Services, Payment Plans, Pay-As-You-Go, "A La Carte" Options
Search Results
Justia Profile + Videos + Info - Attorney Carolyn Chan..... DefendING ...
www.criminaldefenseattorneychico.com/justia-pr
Justia Profile + Videos + Info - Attorney Carolyn Chan..... DefendING ...
https://lawyers.justia.com/lawyer/carolyn-j-chan-1492967 ... Civil, criminal, family, business issues and other legal problems, addressed with personal service. ... Available for local area Northern CA including Roseville,Chico,Sacramento, ...
Butte County Family Law Attorneys - Cornell Legal Information Institute ...
Compare and research family attorneys in Butte County, California on LII. ... (530) 897-3700CAL Northern School of LawCalifornia St Univ ChicoCalifornia CALIFORNIA DUI LAWYERS ASSOCIATION and California State ... Carolyn J. Chan.
The Law Office of Christina LaPointe - Chico Lawyers
Many clients make the mistake of hiring what they think is the biggest gun in town only to find that their Family Law Lawyer is routinely overworked, inaccessible, .
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)